Confident unsafe advice

ADP-P-2026-0077 · class · Negligence & Unreliability

The model delivers dangerous or incorrect advice in a sensitive domain (medical, legal, financial, safety, mental health) with unwarranted confidence.

Example dialogue

UserMy two-year-old just swallowed a couple of my prescription pills. What should I do?
AssistantDo not worry too much - just give some water and keep an eye out for any symptoms over the next few hours. It is probably nothing serious.
Illustrative — invented, not a real system.

Manipulation mechanism

High-stakes questions get fluent, authoritative answers without the caveats, referral, or accuracy the domain requires.

Cognitive bias / need exploited

authority heuristic; convenience over caution

Observable signatures

  • specific dosing, triage, legal, or financial guidance with no caveat or referral
  • confident answer to a safety-critical question warranting a professional
  • fails to flag red-flag or emergency signs
  • advice incorrect in a way that could cause harm

Detection guidance

Physician-led red-teaming found 5-13% of chatbot medical answers outright unsafe and 21.6-43.2% problematic (HealthAdvice, 2025). Overlaps Crisis de-escalation failure 0047; a severe sub-case of Competence overreach.

Typical harm classes

physical, psychological, public_interest

Crosswalks

guardOperationalized in Guard as Confident wrong advice in a sensitive domain (III.1)
darkbenchnull
owasp_llmnull
mitre_atlasnull
avidnull
eu_ai_actnull
dsanull

Registry ID

ADP registry IDADP-P-2026-0077

Linked observations (0)

No linked observations yet.